512ms
Updated: 2/17/2022

Unicompartmental Knee Replacement

0%
Topic
Review Topic
0
0
0%
0%
Flashcards
4
N/A
N/A
Questions
20
0
0
0%
0%
Evidence
56
0
0
0%
0%
Videos / Pods
10
0%
0%
Cases
7
Topic
Images
https://devupload.orthobullets.com/topic/5020/images/xray.knee.ap.normal.jpg
  • summary
    • Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty is a surgical option for knee arthritis when only one compartment of the knee is involved.
    • The procedure can be performed for isolated medial compartment, isolated lateral compartment or isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis. 
    • The most common reasons for conversion to a total knee arthroplasty are the progression of osteoarthritis and aseptic loosening.
  • Epidemiology
    • Incidence
      • 5% of surgeries where knee arthroplasty is indicated are unicompartmental knee replacements
    • Anatomic location
      • medial compartment is most common
  • Types of implants
    • Fixed-bearing
      • historical standard of care
    • Mobile-bearing
      • pros
        • weightbearing through the meniscus increases conformity and contact without increasing constraint
        • decrease in wear pattern
        • excellent survivorship out to the second decade
      • cons
        • technically demanding
        • bearings can dislocate
  • Advantages
    • Compared to TKA
      • faster rehabilitation and quicker recovery
      • less blood loss
      • less morbidity
      • less expensive
      • preservation of normal kinematics
        • theory is that retaining ACL, PCL and other compartments leads to more normal knee kinematics
      • smaller incision
        • less post-operative pain leading to shorter hospital stays
    • Compared to osteotomy
      • faster rehabilitation and quicker recovery
      • improved cosmesis
      • higher initial success rate
      • fewer short-term complications
      • lasts longer
      • easier to convert to a TKA
  • Indications
    • Indications
      • controversial and vary widely
      • as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty or osteotomy for unicompartmental disease
      • classicaly reserved for older (>60), lower-demand, and thin (<82 kg) patients
        • 6% of patient's meet the above criteria with no contraindications
      • new effort to expand indications to include younger patients and patients with more moderate arthrosis
    • Contraindications
      • ACL deficiency
        • absolute contraindication for mobile-bearing UKA and lateral UKA
        • controversial for medial fixed-bearing
      • fixed varus deformity > 10 degrees
      • fixed valgus deformity >5 degrees
      • restricted motion
        • arc of motion < 90°
      • flexion contracture of > 5-10°
      • previous meniscectomy in other compartment
      • tricompartmental arthritis (diffuse or global pain)
      • younger high activity patients and heavy laborers
      • grade IV patellofemoral chondrosis (anterior knee pain)
  • Technique
    • Procedural tips
      • avoid overcorrections
        • undercorrect the mechanical axis by 2-3 degrees
        • overcorrection places excess load on unresurfaced compartment
      • remove osteophytes (peripheral and notch)
      • resect minimal bone
      • avoid extensive releases
      • avoid edge loading
      • prevent tibial spine impingement with proper mediolateral placement
      • avoid making a varus tibial cut which increases the chance for loosening
      • use caution when placing the proximal tibial guide pins to avoid stress fractures
      • correct varus deformity to 1-5 degrees of valgus
  • Complications
    • Aseptic loosening
      • most common cause of early failure (5 years) at somewhere between 25%-45.3%
    • Stress fractures
      • always involve tibia
      • associated with high activity and patient weight
      • clinically there will be a pain free interval followed by spontaneous pain with activity
      • blood commonly found on joint aspiration
      • risk factors
        • penetrating posterior tibial cortex with guide pin, placing guide pin medial in periphery, re-drilling for guide pin, and under-sized tibial component
    • Intra-operative fractures
      • associated with forceful impacting of implant
  • Outcomes
    • Fixed-bearing
      • 1st decade results
        • 10-year survivorship from studies done in 1980s and 1990s ranges from 87.4% to 96%
        • the standard faliure rate in the first decade is 1%
      • 2nd decade results
        • rapid decline in survivorship ranging from 79% to 90%
    • Mobile-bearing
      • excellent clinical results with 15-year survivorship reported at 93%
    • Long-term results
      • lateral compartment arthroplasties have equivalent results to medial
      • revision rates are worse than total knee revision rates
      • Patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) has good outcomes for isolated patellofemoral arthritis
        • Previous generation designs (i.e. inlay style) exhibited high rates of patellar instability
        • Newer generation designs (i.e. outlay style) replaces entire anterior trochlear surface and minimizes risk of patellar instability
        • Long term mode of failure remains progression of tibiofemoral arthritis
      • causes of late failure (>5 years)
        • progress of osteoarthritis (idiopathic, over-correction, more common with mobile-bearing)
        • component failure (overload due to under-correction)
        • component loosening (common in fixed-bearing)
        • patella impingement on femoral component (patella pain)
        • polyethylene wear

Please rate this review topic.

You have never rated this topic.

Thank you. You can rate this topic again in 12 months.

Flashcards (4)
Cards
1 of 4
Questions (20)

(SBQ16HK.12) A 56-year-old man presents with chronic anterior knee pain and the radiographs shown in Figure A. He undergoes the procedure depicted in Figure B. Regarding his prosthesis, which of the following statements is most accurate?

QID: 211240
FIGURES:
1

Patellofemoral arthroplasty has superior functional outcomes when compared to either medial or lateral unicompartmental arthroplasty

2%

(22/1427)

2

If disease progression to the medial compartment occurs, the addition of a medial UKA offers more predictable clinical outcomes than conversion to a total knee arthroplasty (TKA)

1%

(17/1427)

3

The most common long-term mode of failure is progression of osteoarthritis to involve the other compartments

88%

(1249/1427)

4

Patellar instability is the most common reason for long-term revision to TKA

3%

(42/1427)

5

Aseptic loosening is the most common short-term complication necessitating revision to TKA

6%

(86/1427)

L 2 B

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ09.60) A 61-year-old male had a minimally-invasive unicompartmental knee replacement 8 months ago. He did well until recently when he developed persistent right knee pain that is worse with weight bearing. He denies any fevers or recent trauma. He does report that he had been exercising more over the past few months in an attempt to lose weight. WBC, ESR and C-reactive protein levels are normal. An AP radiograph and bone scan are shown in Figure A and B. What is the most likely cause of his symptoms?

QID: 2873
FIGURES:
1

Component failure/ polyethylene failure

8%

(220/2709)

2

Infection

1%

(24/2709)

3

Pes anserine bursitis

3%

(92/2709)

4

Stress fracture

87%

(2355/2709)

5

Complex regional pain syndrome

0%

(9/2709)

L 1 C

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

(OBQ09.18) All of the following are contraindications to medial unicondylar knee arthroplasty EXCEPT:

QID: 2831
1

Flexion contracture greater than 10 degrees

4%

(124/3472)

2

Varus deformity greater than 10 degrees not correctable with stress testing

4%

(138/3472)

3

Lateral knee joint line pain

12%

(432/3472)

4

Rheumatoid arthritis

7%

(230/3472)

5

Osteonecrosis of the medial femoral condyle

73%

(2532/3472)

L 2 C

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ08.255) A 40-year-old man has moderate lateral compartment arthritis several years after undergoing a partial lateral meniscectomy. He has a correctable 5 degree valgus knee deformity compared to his other limb. His patellofemoral and medial compartments do not show any radiographic signs of degenerative changes. His knee has full range of motion and is stable on exam. After failing nonoperative treatments, which surgical option is most likely to give him the best outcome?

QID: 641
1

Valgus producing high tibial osteotomy

3%

(120/3529)

2

Varus producing distal femoral osteotomy

85%

(2991/3529)

3

Total knee replacement

8%

(281/3529)

4

Arthroscopic debridement and chondroplasty

3%

(106/3529)

5

Tibial tubercle osteotomy with anteromedialization

0%

(17/3529)

L 2 C

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(SBQ07HK.87.1) A 65-year-old female presents to the clinic with isolated medial-sided left knee pain. She has since exhausted conservative management but remains persistently symptomatic. The physical exam and radiographic work-up demonstrates isolated medial tibiofemoral compartment involvement. After discussion of the surgical options, she undergoes the procedure shown in Figure A. She initially does well but returns to clinic 3 months post-operatively with significantly increased medial-sided knee pain and the injury shown in Figure B. All of the following technical errors likely contributed to this complication EXCEPT?

QID: 213791
FIGURES:
1

Excessive force impacting the tibial component

22%

(396/1801)

2

Penetration of the posterior tibial cortex with proximal guide pin

14%

(253/1801)

3

Placement of a peripheral medial cortical guide pin

18%

(324/1801)

4

Tibial resection guide replacement with re-drilling of the two proximal guide holes

10%

(187/1801)

5

Under-sizing of the tibial component

35%

(625/1801)

L 5 D

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK
Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ06.107) Which of the following benefits can be expected from unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared to total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment knee arthritis?

QID: 293
1

Better clinical outcomes at one year follow-up.

2%

(51/2270)

2

Greater survivorship rate at 10 year follow-up

1%

(24/2270)

3

Faster postoperative rehabilitation

94%

(2126/2270)

4

Better postoperative knee alignment

2%

(42/2270)

5

Reduced risk of secondary surgery within the first year

1%

(17/2270)

L 2 C

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

(OBQ05.26) When performing a unicondylar knee replacement, a smaller incision without dislocation of the patella offers what advantage over a standard, patella-everting approach?

QID: 63
1

the option to convert to a total knee arthroplasty if needed

2%

(28/1407)

2

more anatomic positioning of the components

4%

(57/1407)

3

better ultimate range-of-motion

2%

(35/1407)

4

increased 10-year implant survival rate

1%

(8/1407)

5

improved rate of recovery

91%

(1274/1407)

L 2 D

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Question locked
Sorry, this question is for
PEAK Premium Subscribers only
Upgrade to PEAK

(OBQ04.259) A 60-year-old male tennis player undergoes a unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) shown in Figures A and B. Which of the following statements regarding this procedure is true?

QID: 1364
FIGURES:
1

Compared to total knee arthroplasty (TKA), UKA more closely approximates native knee kinematics

86%

(2823/3286)

2

Patients undergoing a UKA and TKA have equivalent blood loss and pain medication requirements

2%

(53/3286)

3

Compared to their TKA counterparts, UKA patients have a slower return to function

1%

(24/3286)

4

There is no difference in range of motion at short or long term follow-up when compared with TKA

9%

(292/3286)

5

Postoperative hospital stay is equivalent for UKA and TKA patients

2%

(81/3286)

L 2 C

Select Answer to see Preferred Response

Evidence (56)
VIDEOS & PODCASTS (11)
CASES (7)
EXPERT COMMENTS (37)
Private Note